Redland City Council Score: 43/100 — What Residents Should Know
Redland City Council scores 43/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Financial Sustainability (75/100). Ranked #8 of 8 metropolitan councils in QLD.
Redland City Council records a composite score of 43/100 (developing), ranking 8th of 8 in its metro peer group and 68th of 77 across QLD. It sits in the bottom quartile of QLD's metro councils, serving roughly 165k residents in a metropolitan area.On Financial Sustainability, Redland City Council posts 75/100 (strong). That stands well above the metro peer average of 56 and stands well above the QLD state average of 52. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 31/100 for Redland City Council, rated needs improvement. That lags well behind the metro peer average of 56 and lags well behind the QLD state average of 52. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 12/100 — reads as needs improvement. That lags well behind the metro peer average of 56 and lags well behind the QLD state average of 52. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Redland City Council lands on 54/100, a solid result. That roughly matches the metro peer average of 56 and roughly matches the QLD state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Redland City Council's strongest showing is on Financial Sustainability (75) and Core Operations (54). Practically, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded. Alongside that, strong core operations mean waste, roads and planning approvals are running smoothly and rates are more likely to be delivering visible value.On the flip side, a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. And weaker lifestyle and amenity results tend to show up in ageing sportsgrounds, tired playgrounds, or a thinner events calendar. The weakest dimensions here — Community Services (31) and Lifestyle & Amenity (12) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 75/100 | strong |
| Community Services | 31/100 | needs improvement |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 12/100 | needs improvement |
| Core Operations | 54/100 | solid |
| Composite | 43/100 | developing |
Related Councils: redland