Mareeba Shire Council Score: 35/100 — What Residents Should Know
Mareeba Shire Council scores 35/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Financial Sustainability (73/100). Ranked #30 of 30 regional councils in QLD.
Mareeba Shire Council records a composite score of 35/100 (developing), ranking 30th of 30 in its regional peer group and 74th of 77 across QLD. It sits in the bottom quartile of QLD's regional councils, serving around 22k residents in a regional centre.On Financial Sustainability, Mareeba Shire Council posts 73/100 (strong). That stands well above the regional peer average of 52 and stands well above the QLD state average of 52. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 28/100 for Mareeba Shire Council, rated needs improvement. That lags well behind the regional peer average of 52 and lags well behind the QLD state average of 52. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 7/100 — reads as needs improvement. That lags well behind the regional peer average of 52 and lags well behind the QLD state average of 52. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Mareeba Shire Council lands on 33/100, a needs improvement result. That lags well behind the regional peer average of 52 and lags well behind the QLD state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Mareeba Shire Council's strongest showing is on Financial Sustainability (73) and Core Operations (33). Practically, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded. Alongside that, strong core operations mean waste, roads and planning approvals are running smoothly and rates are more likely to be delivering visible value.On the flip side, a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. And weaker lifestyle and amenity results tend to show up in ageing sportsgrounds, tired playgrounds, or a thinner events calendar. The weakest dimensions here — Community Services (28) and Lifestyle & Amenity (7) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 73/100 | strong |
| Community Services | 28/100 | needs improvement |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 7/100 | needs improvement |
| Core Operations | 33/100 | needs improvement |
| Composite | 35/100 | developing |
Related Councils: mareeba