Maitland Council Score: 30/100 — What Residents Should Know
Maitland scores 30/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Financial Sustainability (39/100). Ranked #78 of 79 regional councils in NSW.
Maitland records a composite score of 30/100 (needs improvement), ranking 78th of 79 in its regional peer group and 126th of 128 across NSW. It sits in the bottom quartile of NSW's regional councils, serving around 90k residents in a regional centre.On Financial Sustainability, Maitland posts 39/100 (developing). That trails the regional peer average of 51 and trails the NSW state average of 51. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 19/100 for Maitland, rated needs improvement. That lags well behind the regional peer average of 51 and lags well behind the NSW state average of 51. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 28/100 — reads as needs improvement. That lags well behind the regional peer average of 51 and lags well behind the NSW state average of 51. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Maitland lands on 34/100, a needs improvement result. That lags well behind the regional peer average of 51 and lags well behind the NSW state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Maitland's strongest showing is on Financial Sustainability (39) and Core Operations (34). Practically, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded. Alongside that, strong core operations mean waste, roads and planning approvals are running smoothly and rates are more likely to be delivering visible value.On the flip side, weaker lifestyle and amenity results tend to show up in ageing sportsgrounds, tired playgrounds, or a thinner events calendar. And a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. The weakest dimensions here — Lifestyle & Amenity (28) and Community Services (19) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 39/100 | developing |
| Community Services | 19/100 | needs improvement |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 28/100 | needs improvement |
| Core Operations | 34/100 | needs improvement |
| Composite | 30/100 | needs improvement |
Related Councils: maitland