Macedon Ranges Shire Council Score: 52/100 — What Residents Should Know
Macedon Ranges Shire scores 52/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Community Services (69/100). Ranked #17 of 29 regional councils in VIC.
Macedon Ranges Shire records a composite score of 52/100 (solid), ranking 17th of 29 in its regional peer group and 43rd of 79 across VIC. It sits in the lower half of VIC's regional councils, serving around 53k residents in a regional centre.On Financial Sustainability, Macedon Ranges Shire posts 55/100 (solid). That roughly matches the regional peer average of 52 and roughly matches the VIC state average of 52. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 69/100 for Macedon Ranges Shire, rated strong. That stands well above the regional peer average of 52 and stands well above the VIC state average of 52. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 46/100 — reads as developing. That sits modestly below the regional peer average of 52 and sits modestly below the VIC state average of 52. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Macedon Ranges Shire lands on 40/100, a developing result. That trails the regional peer average of 52 and trails the VIC state average of 52. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Macedon Ranges Shire's strongest showing is on Community Services (69) and Financial Sustainability (55). Practically, strong community services translate into more reliable libraries, maternal health, aged support and community programs — a real day-to-day benefit for families and older residents. Alongside that, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded.On the flip side, weaker lifestyle and amenity results tend to show up in ageing sportsgrounds, tired playgrounds, or a thinner events calendar. And a low core operations score is often felt through slower planning approvals, patchier road maintenance, and rougher waste and customer service experiences. The weakest dimensions here — Lifestyle & Amenity (46) and Core Operations (40) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 55/100 | solid |
| Community Services | 69/100 | strong |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 46/100 | developing |
| Core Operations | 40/100 | developing |
| Composite | 52/100 | solid |
Related Councils: macedon-ranges-shire