Logan City Council Score: 74/100 — What Residents Should Know
Logan City Council scores 74/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Lifestyle & Amenity (100/100). Ranked #1 of 8 metropolitan councils in QLD.
Logan City Council records a composite score of 74/100 (strong), ranking 1st of 8 in its metro peer group and 1st of 77 across QLD. It sits in the top quartile of QLD's metro councils, serving roughly 350k residents in a metropolitan area.On Financial Sustainability, Logan City Council posts 70/100 (strong). That runs comfortably ahead of the metro peer average of 56 and stands well above the QLD state average of 52. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 44/100 for Logan City Council, rated developing. That trails the metro peer average of 56 and sits modestly below the QLD state average of 52. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 100/100 — reads as excellent. That stands well above the metro peer average of 56 and stands well above the QLD state average of 52. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Logan City Council lands on 83/100, a excellent result. That stands well above the metro peer average of 56 and stands well above the QLD state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Logan City Council's strongest showing is on Lifestyle & Amenity (100) and Core Operations (83). Practically, strong lifestyle and amenity scores point to better-maintained parks, sportsgrounds and cultural venues, and generally a more liveable public realm. Alongside that, strong core operations mean waste, roads and planning approvals are running smoothly and rates are more likely to be delivering visible value.On the flip side, weaker financial sustainability often shows up over time as sharper rates increases, deferred renewals, or borrowing to cover recurrent costs. And a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. The weakest dimensions here — Financial Sustainability (70) and Community Services (44) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 70/100 | strong |
| Community Services | 44/100 | developing |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 100/100 | excellent |
| Core Operations | 83/100 | excellent |
| Composite | 74/100 | strong |
Related Councils: logan