← Back to Insights
Spotlight ·

Lake Macquarie Council Score: 39/100 — What Residents Should Know

Lake Macquarie scores 39/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Financial Sustainability (49/100). Ranked #69 of 79 regional councils in NSW.

Lake Macquarie records a composite score of 39/100 (developing), ranking 69th of 79 in its regional peer group and 112th of 128 across NSW. It sits in the bottom quartile of NSW's regional councils, serving roughly 210k residents in a regional centre.On Financial Sustainability, Lake Macquarie posts 49/100 (developing). That roughly matches the regional peer average of 51 and roughly matches the NSW state average of 51. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 33/100 for Lake Macquarie, rated needs improvement. That lags well behind the regional peer average of 51 and lags well behind the NSW state average of 51. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 46/100 — reads as developing. That sits modestly below the regional peer average of 51 and sits modestly below the NSW state average of 51. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Lake Macquarie lands on 26/100, a needs improvement result. That lags well behind the regional peer average of 51 and lags well behind the NSW state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.

What This Means For Residents

Lake Macquarie's strongest showing is on Financial Sustainability (49) and Lifestyle & Amenity (46). Practically, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded. Alongside that, strong lifestyle and amenity scores point to better-maintained parks, sportsgrounds and cultural venues, and generally a more liveable public realm.On the flip side, a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. And a low core operations score is often felt through slower planning approvals, patchier road maintenance, and rougher waste and customer service experiences. The weakest dimensions here — Community Services (33) and Core Operations (26) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.

Score Breakdown

DimensionScoreTier
Financial Sustainability49/100developing
Community Services33/100needs improvement
Lifestyle & Amenity46/100developing
Core Operations26/100needs improvement
Composite39/100developing
See the full breakdown on the Lake Macquarie council profile, or use the comparison tool to see how Lake Macquarie stacks up against neighbouring or peer councils.

Related Councils: lake-macquarie