Hunters Hill Council Score: 51/100 — What Residents Should Know
Hunters Hill scores 51/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Core Operations (60/100). Ranked #18 of 34 metropolitan councils in NSW.
Hunters Hill records a composite score of 51/100 (solid), ranking 19th of 34 in its metro peer group and 70th of 128 across NSW. It sits in the lower half of NSW's metro councils, serving around 14k residents in a metropolitan area.On Financial Sustainability, Hunters Hill posts 36/100 (developing). That lags well behind the metro peer average of 52 and trails the NSW state average of 51. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 49/100 for Hunters Hill, rated developing. That roughly matches the metro peer average of 51 and roughly matches the NSW state average of 51. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 59/100 — reads as solid. That sits modestly above the metro peer average of 51 and sits modestly above the NSW state average of 51. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Hunters Hill lands on 60/100, a solid result. That sits modestly above the metro peer average of 52 and runs comfortably ahead of the NSW state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Hunters Hill's strongest showing is on Core Operations (60) and Lifestyle & Amenity (59). Practically, strong core operations mean waste, roads and planning approvals are running smoothly and rates are more likely to be delivering visible value. Alongside that, strong lifestyle and amenity scores point to better-maintained parks, sportsgrounds and cultural venues, and generally a more liveable public realm.On the flip side, a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. And weaker financial sustainability often shows up over time as sharper rates increases, deferred renewals, or borrowing to cover recurrent costs. The weakest dimensions here — Community Services (49) and Financial Sustainability (36) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 36/100 | developing |
| Community Services | 49/100 | developing |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 59/100 | solid |
| Core Operations | 60/100 | solid |
| Composite | 51/100 | solid |
Related Councils: hunters-hill