Hawkesbury Council Score: 51/100 — What Residents Should Know
Hawkesbury scores 51/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Core Operations (71/100). Ranked #18 of 34 metropolitan councils in NSW.
Hawkesbury records a composite score of 51/100 (solid), ranking 18th of 34 in its metro peer group and 69th of 128 across NSW. It sits in the lower half of NSW's metro councils, serving around 70k residents in a metropolitan area.On Financial Sustainability, Hawkesbury posts 43/100 (developing). That trails the metro peer average of 52 and sits modestly below the NSW state average of 51. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 49/100 for Hawkesbury, rated developing. That roughly matches the metro peer average of 51 and roughly matches the NSW state average of 51. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 39/100 — reads as developing. That trails the metro peer average of 51 and trails the NSW state average of 51. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Hawkesbury lands on 71/100, a strong result. That stands well above the metro peer average of 52 and stands well above the NSW state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Hawkesbury's strongest showing is on Core Operations (71) and Community Services (49). Practically, strong core operations mean waste, roads and planning approvals are running smoothly and rates are more likely to be delivering visible value. Alongside that, strong community services translate into more reliable libraries, maternal health, aged support and community programs — a real day-to-day benefit for families and older residents.On the flip side, weaker financial sustainability often shows up over time as sharper rates increases, deferred renewals, or borrowing to cover recurrent costs. And weaker lifestyle and amenity results tend to show up in ageing sportsgrounds, tired playgrounds, or a thinner events calendar. The weakest dimensions here — Financial Sustainability (43) and Lifestyle & Amenity (39) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 43/100 | developing |
| Community Services | 49/100 | developing |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 39/100 | developing |
| Core Operations | 71/100 | strong |
| Composite | 51/100 | solid |
Related Councils: hawkesbury