Gunnedah Council Score: 61/100 — What Residents Should Know
Gunnedah scores 61/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Lifestyle & Amenity (83/100). Ranked #13 of 79 regional councils in NSW.
Gunnedah records a composite score of 61/100 (solid), ranking 15th of 79 in its regional peer group and 25th of 128 across NSW. It sits in the top quartile of NSW's regional councils, serving around 13k residents in a regional centre.On Financial Sustainability, Gunnedah posts 70/100 (strong). That stands well above the regional peer average of 51 and stands well above the NSW state average of 51. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 47/100 for Gunnedah, rated developing. That sits modestly below the regional peer average of 51 and sits modestly below the NSW state average of 51. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 83/100 — reads as excellent. That stands well above the regional peer average of 51 and stands well above the NSW state average of 51. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Gunnedah lands on 45/100, a developing result. That sits modestly below the regional peer average of 51 and sits modestly below the NSW state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Gunnedah's strongest showing is on Lifestyle & Amenity (83) and Financial Sustainability (70). Practically, strong lifestyle and amenity scores point to better-maintained parks, sportsgrounds and cultural venues, and generally a more liveable public realm. Alongside that, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded.On the flip side, a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. And a low core operations score is often felt through slower planning approvals, patchier road maintenance, and rougher waste and customer service experiences. The weakest dimensions here — Community Services (47) and Core Operations (45) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 70/100 | strong |
| Community Services | 47/100 | developing |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 83/100 | excellent |
| Core Operations | 45/100 | developing |
| Composite | 61/100 | solid |
Related Councils: gunnedah