Cardinia Shire Council Score: 46/100 — What Residents Should Know
Cardinia Shire scores 46/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Lifestyle & Amenity (52/100). Ranked #22 of 31 metropolitan councils in VIC.
Cardinia Shire records a composite score of 46/100 (developing), ranking 22nd of 31 in its metro peer group and 58th of 79 across VIC. It sits in the lower half of VIC's metro councils, serving roughly 130k residents in a metropolitan area.On Financial Sustainability, Cardinia Shire posts 48/100 (developing). That sits modestly below the metro peer average of 52 and sits modestly below the VIC state average of 52. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 35/100 for Cardinia Shire, rated developing. That lags well behind the metro peer average of 52 and lags well behind the VIC state average of 52. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 52/100 — reads as solid. That roughly matches the metro peer average of 52 and roughly matches the VIC state average of 52. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Cardinia Shire lands on 50/100, a solid result. That roughly matches the metro peer average of 52 and roughly matches the VIC state average of 52. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Cardinia Shire's strongest showing is on Lifestyle & Amenity (52) and Core Operations (50). Practically, strong lifestyle and amenity scores point to better-maintained parks, sportsgrounds and cultural venues, and generally a more liveable public realm. Alongside that, strong core operations mean waste, roads and planning approvals are running smoothly and rates are more likely to be delivering visible value.On the flip side, weaker financial sustainability often shows up over time as sharper rates increases, deferred renewals, or borrowing to cover recurrent costs. And a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. The weakest dimensions here — Financial Sustainability (48) and Community Services (35) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 48/100 | developing |
| Community Services | 35/100 | developing |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 52/100 | solid |
| Core Operations | 50/100 | solid |
| Composite | 46/100 | developing |
Related Councils: cardinia-shire