Burke Shire Council Score: 37/100 — What Residents Should Know
Burke Shire Council scores 37/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Financial Sustainability (56/100). Ranked #38 of 41 rural councils in QLD.
Burke Shire Council records a composite score of 37/100 (developing), ranking 36th of 39 in its rural peer group and 73rd of 77 across QLD. It sits in the bottom quartile of QLD's rural councils, serving about 500 residents in a rural community.On Financial Sustainability, Burke Shire Council posts 56/100 (solid). That sits modestly above the rural peer average of 51 and sits modestly above the QLD state average of 52. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 34/100 for Burke Shire Council, rated needs improvement. That lags well behind the rural peer average of 51 and lags well behind the QLD state average of 52. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 4/100 — reads as needs improvement. That lags well behind the rural peer average of 51 and lags well behind the QLD state average of 52. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Burke Shire Council lands on 52/100, a solid result. That roughly matches the rural peer average of 50 and roughly matches the QLD state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Burke Shire Council's strongest showing is on Financial Sustainability (56) and Core Operations (52). Practically, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded. Alongside that, strong core operations mean waste, roads and planning approvals are running smoothly and rates are more likely to be delivering visible value.On the flip side, a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. And weaker lifestyle and amenity results tend to show up in ageing sportsgrounds, tired playgrounds, or a thinner events calendar. The weakest dimensions here — Community Services (34) and Lifestyle & Amenity (4) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 56/100 | solid |
| Community Services | 34/100 | needs improvement |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 4/100 | needs improvement |
| Core Operations | 52/100 | solid |
| Composite | 37/100 | developing |
Related Councils: burke