Bundaberg Regional Council Score: 51/100 — What Residents Should Know
Bundaberg Regional Council scores 51/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Community Services (73/100). Ranked #16 of 30 regional councils in QLD.
Bundaberg Regional Council records a composite score of 51/100 (solid), ranking 16th of 30 in its regional peer group and 39th of 77 across QLD. It sits in the lower half of QLD's regional councils, serving roughly 105k residents in a regional centre.On Financial Sustainability, Bundaberg Regional Council posts 46/100 (developing). That sits modestly below the regional peer average of 52 and sits modestly below the QLD state average of 52. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 73/100 for Bundaberg Regional Council, rated strong. That stands well above the regional peer average of 52 and stands well above the QLD state average of 52. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 40/100 — reads as developing. That trails the regional peer average of 52 and trails the QLD state average of 52. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Bundaberg Regional Council lands on 46/100, a developing result. That sits modestly below the regional peer average of 52 and sits modestly below the QLD state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Bundaberg Regional Council's strongest showing is on Community Services (73) and Financial Sustainability (46). Practically, strong community services translate into more reliable libraries, maternal health, aged support and community programs — a real day-to-day benefit for families and older residents. Alongside that, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded.On the flip side, a low core operations score is often felt through slower planning approvals, patchier road maintenance, and rougher waste and customer service experiences. And weaker lifestyle and amenity results tend to show up in ageing sportsgrounds, tired playgrounds, or a thinner events calendar. The weakest dimensions here — Core Operations (46) and Lifestyle & Amenity (40) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 46/100 | developing |
| Community Services | 73/100 | strong |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 40/100 | developing |
| Core Operations | 46/100 | developing |
| Composite | 51/100 | solid |
Related Councils: bundaberg