Bland Council Score: 74/100 — What Residents Should Know
Bland scores 74/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Core Operations (87/100). Ranked #1 of 79 regional councils in NSW.
Bland records a composite score of 74/100 (strong), ranking 1st of 79 in its regional peer group and 1st of 128 across NSW. It sits in the top quartile of NSW's regional councils, serving about 6,000 residents in a regional centre.On Financial Sustainability, Bland posts 80/100 (excellent). That stands well above the regional peer average of 51 and stands well above the NSW state average of 51. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 69/100 for Bland, rated strong. That stands well above the regional peer average of 51 and stands well above the NSW state average of 51. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 59/100 — reads as solid. That sits modestly above the regional peer average of 51 and sits modestly above the NSW state average of 51. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Bland lands on 87/100, a excellent result. That stands well above the regional peer average of 51 and stands well above the NSW state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Bland's strongest showing is on Core Operations (87) and Financial Sustainability (80). Practically, strong core operations mean waste, roads and planning approvals are running smoothly and rates are more likely to be delivering visible value. Alongside that, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded.On the flip side, a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. And weaker lifestyle and amenity results tend to show up in ageing sportsgrounds, tired playgrounds, or a thinner events calendar. The weakest dimensions here — Community Services (69) and Lifestyle & Amenity (59) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 80/100 | excellent |
| Community Services | 69/100 | strong |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 59/100 | solid |
| Core Operations | 87/100 | excellent |
| Composite | 74/100 | strong |
Related Councils: bland