Albury Council Score: 44/100 — What Residents Should Know
Albury scores 44/100 overall, with its strongest performance in Lifestyle & Amenity (64/100). Ranked #59 of 79 regional councils in NSW.
Albury records a composite score of 44/100 (developing), ranking 59th of 79 in its regional peer group and 97th of 128 across NSW. It sits in the lower half of NSW's regional councils, serving around 56k residents in a regional centre.On Financial Sustainability, Albury posts 46/100 (developing). That sits modestly below the regional peer average of 51 and sits modestly below the NSW state average of 51. It captures how well the council balances its books, manages debt, and funds future infrastructure without over-relying on rates increases.Community Services comes in at 40/100 for Albury, rated developing. That trails the regional peer average of 51 and trails the NSW state average of 51. It captures the reach and quality of libraries, childcare, aged support, community centres, and grants that touch daily life.The council's Lifestyle & Amenity result — 64/100 — reads as solid. That runs comfortably ahead of the regional peer average of 51 and runs comfortably ahead of the NSW state average of 51. It captures parks, sportsgrounds, cultural venues, events, and the general liveability of the area relative to what residents pay.For Core Operations, Albury lands on 27/100, a needs improvement result. That lags well behind the regional peer average of 51 and lags well behind the NSW state average of 51. It captures the essentials — roads, waste, planning approvals, and how efficiently the council runs its day-to-day services.
What This Means For Residents
Albury's strongest showing is on Lifestyle & Amenity (64) and Financial Sustainability (46). Practically, strong lifestyle and amenity scores point to better-maintained parks, sportsgrounds and cultural venues, and generally a more liveable public realm. Alongside that, a stronger financial position tends to mean rates rises are less likely to be driven by budget shortfalls, and long-term infrastructure planning is better funded.On the flip side, a lower community services score usually means thinner program hours, fewer support staff, or gaps in facilities like libraries and community centres. And a low core operations score is often felt through slower planning approvals, patchier road maintenance, and rougher waste and customer service experiences. The weakest dimensions here — Community Services (40) and Core Operations (27) — are the areas most likely to shape resident complaints and future rates decisions.Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Sustainability | 46/100 | developing |
| Community Services | 40/100 | developing |
| Lifestyle & Amenity | 64/100 | solid |
| Core Operations | 27/100 | needs improvement |
| Composite | 44/100 | developing |
Related Councils: albury